Skip to main content
Traditional token models generally operate under a dual token / equity structure. In this framework, tokens are often issued as utility or governance instruments, while true economic ownership remains exclusively tied to company equity. As a result, the primary “cost” for teams selling tokens is simply the opportunity cost that those tokens might be worth more in the future. There is no direct corporate consequence for token issuance. This disconnect is one of the key reasons why crypto valuations are so difficult to model consistently. Traditional financial frameworks (such as EBITDA-based models) fail to capture this duality. Token holders frequently lack explicit economic rights, making governance or utility tokens insufficient proxies for real ownership. As seen in examples like $UNI, the private company can benefit greatly from product success, yet little to no value necessarily accrues back to the token or its holders. Real business value and token value can remain almost entirely uncorrelated.

​
What DRP Changes

The Digital Representation of Participation (DRP) standard fundamentally restructures the relationship between tokens, the business, and the team launching the token. Under DRP, tokens are not abstract utility instruments. They are tied to a Senior Debt (SD) obligation that the company incurs as tokens enter circulation. Anytime a Founder sells or releases tokens from custody into the market, a corresponding debt against the real business is created. Conversely, if the Founder repurchases tokens (buybacks), the debt decreases. This introduces a true economic opportunity cost. Businesses can no longer treat token issuance as a risk-free fundraising mechanism. Instead, token activity directly impacts the company’s financial liability. This structure accomplishes three critical outcomes:
  1. Eliminates the dual standard
    Tokens are no longer parallel to equity — they become financially interconnected.
    Circulating token supply directly mirrors the percentage of company value owed to SOAR via the Senior Debt instrument.
  2. Incentivizes responsible token management
    Teams are disincentivized from selling tokens recklessly, as doing so increases debt obligations. Tokens are released only when purposeful — for expansion, operations, strategic initiatives, or other justified needs.
    On the other hand, acquiring tokens back (buybacks) reduces debt, aligning Founder incentives with long-term token stability and value.
  3. Aligns Founders and token holders
    Because circulating tokens create real debt exposure, Founders must consider token holders in business decision-making. This creates a push-pull equilibrium:
    • Selling tokens increases debt → disincentive
    • Buying tokens decreases debt → incentive
    As a result, token supply trends toward reflecting responsible stewardship rather than unchecked dilution.

​
Why This Matters

The DRP mechanism achieves what traditional tokenomics fail to deliver:
  • Direct linkage between token activity and business fundamentals
  • Accountability for token issuance
  • Incentives to conduct buybacks based on company performance
  • Financial protection for token holders
  • Predictable modeling tied to circulating supply
In this framework, tokens are no longer speculative side bets. They become a transparent representation of the business’s evolving value and operational decisions. DRP transforms tokens into a measurable financial instrument, enabling far clearer valuation, aligned incentives, and long-term value creation. Ultimately, DRP replaces arbitrary token models with a structure that rewards responsible Founders, protects participants, and anchors token value to real business outcomes — closing the gap between on-chain economic activity and off-chain company performance.